When We Refuse to Forgive

Older couple sitting apart with arms crossed, conveying emotional distance and refusal to forgive

Some hurts don’t get forgiven quickly—and some don’t get forgiven at all. Not because the person holding onto them is stubborn or cold, but because staying guarded has, at some point, felt like the only way to stay safe.

Janis Abrahms-Spring, in her book How Can I Forgive You?, names this refusing to forgive—the opposite end of the spectrum from cheap forgiveness, where people let something go before they’ve actually reckoned with it. Refusing to forgive is what happens when someone never lets go at all. The bitterness, the anger, the distance—they become the way the relationship stays.

It’s an understandable response. It’s also a costly one.

Prefer to watch? Here’s the video version of this post, from several years ago.

What Is Refusing to Forgive?

Refusing to forgive means holding on to hurt, anger, and resentment rather than working through them. It’s the second approach to forgiveness Janis Abrahms-Spring identifies in How Can I Forgive You?—the opposite end of the spectrum from cheap forgiveness, where someone lets go too soon. Here, someone doesn’t let go at all.

It’s Natural to Be Cautious After Betrayal

Wariness after being hurt isn’t the problem. It’s often wisdom.

Too often, the person who’s been hurt feels pressure—from the other person, from well-meaning friends, from their own impatience—to grant forgiveness quickly. That pressure can push someone into cheap forgiveness: saying the words before the reckoning has actually happened.

Taking time to understand what happened, and what it will take to move forward safely, isn’t refusal. It’s the offending party’s job to do the harder work—looking honestly at themselves, taking real accountability, and changing the behavior that caused the harm. Caution during that process is appropriate. It’s what comes after—when the accountability has happened, when real change is visible, and the guardedness still doesn’t lift—that this post is really about.

Why We Refuse to Forgive

Refusing to forgive rarely comes from one place. For some, it’s shaped by what they learned long before this relationship. For others, it’s a response to what’s missing from this one. And sometimes, it’s protecting something the person holding on hasn’t fully named, even to themselves. Here’s what tends to be underneath refusal to forgive.

A History of Unsafe Relationships

Some people learn early, and repeatedly, that trusting others isn’t safe. Growing up around deceit, self-centeredness, neglect, or abuse teaches a lesson that outlasts any one relationship: other people can’t be relied on to treat you well, so it’s on you to stay alert.

That lesson doesn’t stay contained to where it was learned. It travels into other relationships, even ones that don’t repeat the original harm. Vigilance starts to feel like the only form of protection that’s ever worked—so relaxing it, even with someone who’s genuinely trying, can feel dangerous rather than safe.

Refusing to forgive, in this case, isn’t solely about the person in front of you. It’s a strategy that was built somewhere else, for someone else, and hasn’t been updated since.

Lack of Sincere Remorse & Change

Healing happens best when the person who caused harm meets it with real remorse—not just an apology, but visible, sustained change in behavior. When that doesn’t happen, staying guarded isn’t stubbornness. It’s a reasonable read of the evidence.

Without that experience, it’s easy to land on a conclusion that feels less like pessimism and more like self-protection: people don’t really change. “A tiger can’t change its stripes.” If nothing has actually shifted, why should we trust?

The harder question this reason doesn’t always answer on its own is what happens when change does come—slowly, imperfectly, but sincerely. That’s often where refusing to forgive stops being a response to the evidence and starts being something else.

Black-and-White Thinking as Self-Protection

Sometimes refusing to forgive isn’t really about the offense itself—it’s about what looking any closer might seem to require. If we examine our own part in a relational pattern, even a small one, it can start to feel like we’re excusing what was done to us, or agreeing that it mattered less than it did. So the pain gets held onto in most condensed, one-sided form: what happened to me, done by them, full stop. Nothing shared, nothing complicated, nothing to look at on our side of it.

This usually isn’t a conscious decision. It’s a way of protecting the clarity of our own hurt—because once the picture gets more complicated, it can feel like we’re losing our footing, or losing our case.

To be clear: examining our own part in an ongoing pattern is not the same as excusing harm, and it doesn’t require deciding that harm was smaller than it was. This isn’t about relationships marked by abuse or one-sided betrayal, where insisting that the victim look inward is the wrong move entirely. It’s about the more common, harder-to-see situations—the ongoing, everyday friction of a relationship—where black-and-white thinking can quietly become its own form of self-protection, holding a stance of “all their fault, none of mine” long after that stance stops reflecting what’s actually true.

Why It Can Feel Automatic

Whatever the origin—an unsafe history, a lack of real remorse, or the quiet self-protection of black-and-white thinking—the nervous system doesn’t just note the danger and move on. It’s built to keep us safe, and sometimes it does that by writing an implicit rule and running on it without our consent or awareness:

Never forgive. Never forget. Never trust. Always be on your guard.

That rule doesn’t feel like a choice. It feels like instinct—the same instinct that makes us flinch at a sound that once meant danger, long after the danger has passed. Refusing to forgive can operate the same way: not a decision we keep making, but a state the body settled into and hasn’t yet been convinced it’s safe to leave.

The Cost of Refusing to Forgive

A body that stays on guard doesn’t get to rest. Refusing to forgive keeps the nervous system in a low-grade state of alert long after the original danger has passed—and that state has a cost that shows up as more than emotional weight. Over time, it contributes to anxiety, depression, physical symptoms, and a kind of chronic dissatisfaction that’s hard to trace back to any one cause. The body doesn’t distinguish between a threat that’s still active and one that’s being remembered as though it is.

It costs the relationship, too—if there’s still a relationship to speak of. Refusing to forgive can feel like protection, but it’s a cold one. It isolates us from the person who hurt us, often from other people as well, and from the best possibilities still available within ourselves: the capacity to trust again, to be surprised by someone, to let a relationship become something other than what it was at its worst moment.

And sometimes, refusing to forgive isn’t just pain that hasn’t resolved—it’s punishment that hasn’t stopped. Staying stuck in refusal can become a way of avoiding a harder decision: whether to do the real work of rebuilding, or to leave. Instead, the relationship gets suspended in between—never repaired, never released—while the other person serves an open-ended lifelong sentence. That isn’t safety, nor is it healing. It’s a different kind of captivity for both parties.

Refusing to forgive rarely protects the future the way it feels like it will. It protects the past, at the expense of what could still be built.

We Need Better Options for Forgiveness

Cheap forgiveness and refusing to forgive sit at opposite ends of the same problem: both ask us to choose between letting go too soon or not letting go at all. Neither one actually resolves anything. One skips the reckoning. The other never reaches it.

What we need instead are options that hold all of it at once—safety, dignity, accountability—without demanding we pretend the hurt didn’t happen or stay permanently guarded against a future that might look different from the past.

Sometimes that looks like acceptance: finding peace and moving forward even when the other person hasn’t done their part, or isn’t available to. (link to Acceptance post, once built)

Sometimes, when real accountability and change are present, it looks like genuine forgiveness—not the quick, cheap kind, but the kind that’s actually earned—and granted. (link to Genuine Forgiveness post, once built)

Still keeping your guard up, even when part of you wants to let it down?

If the guard you put up back then hasn’t come down since, individual counseling focused on relationship dynamics can help you understand what’s underneath the refusal—not to talk you out of your pain, but to help you find a way through it that doesn’t mean staying stuck. For many people, that work is also what makes couples counseling possible later, once the pattern that’s been running the show has some room to loosen.


Common Questions About Refusing to Forgive

Sometimes the block is internal—shaped by history, unmet remorse, or self-protective thinking, all of which we cover above. Other times, it’s less about your own stuck place and more that the other person hasn’t done their part. If that’s closer to your situation, [acceptance](link to Acceptance post, once built) speaks more directly to what you’re facing.

Caution says: I need to see real, sustained change before I trust again. Refusal says: no amount of change will be enough—or quietly demands a perfection no one could sustain. One responds to evidence as it comes. The other becomes a fixed stance, regardless of what happens next.

It can feel that way—but the protection often costs more than it prevents. Staying permanently on guard doesn’t just block the person who hurt you. Over time, it can block trust, connection, and rest for you too, even after the danger itself is gone.

There’s no fast fix, and that’s alright—refusing to forgive is usually a protective pattern that formed for real reasons. Individual counseling for relationship problems can help you understand what the refusal has been protecting you from, so you can decide, on your own terms, what comes next.


By Paul Sigafus, LMFT
Originally published October 2019 · Updated August 14, 2026

avatarImage

About Paul Sigafus, LMFT

Paul Sigafus, LMFT, is the founder and Executive Director of Colorado Counseling Center, where he has been helping individuals and couples find deeper connection since 2008. With 25 years of clinical experience rooted in Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), he holds one enduring belief: that the relationships we build with ourselves and each other are the most important work of our lives.